<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Structural Ethics on After the Code</title><link>https://windshock.github.io/en/tags/structural-ethics/</link><description>Recent content in Structural Ethics on After the Code</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://windshock.github.io/en/tags/structural-ethics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Critical Reading of Structural Ethics in Cybersecurity Policy: Korea's 2025 Whole-of-Government Information Protection Plan</title><link>https://windshock.github.io/en/post/2026-05-24-structural-ethics-cybersecurity-policy-korea/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://windshock.github.io/en/post/2026-05-24-structural-ethics-cybersecurity-policy-korea/</guid><description>A reading of Korea&amp;#39;s 2025 whole-of-government information protection plan through the structural parallel between the Nightingale myth and the white-hacker discourse. Policy is moving from dependence on individual ethics toward structural accountability, but the transition is not complete.</description></item></channel></rss>