<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Joern on After the Code</title><link>https://windshock.github.io/en/tags/joern/</link><description>Recent content in Joern on After the Code</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://windshock.github.io/en/tags/joern/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>An Audit Workflow Survives Only When It Absorbs Misses — Eight Reinforcements to sec-audit-static v2.0</title><link>https://windshock.github.io/en/post/2026-05-19-sec-audit-static-feedback-loop/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://windshock.github.io/en/post/2026-05-19-sec-audit-static-feedback-loop/</guid><description>I designed sec-audit-static workflow v2.0, ran it against a real auth-server codebase, and missed two things. This is the record of how those misses were folded back into the tool — through v2.8.</description></item></channel></rss>